This matter surely still has enough room for twists and turns, as long as people have sufficient patience.
But the situation that patience might imply—the most direct reaction—is that someone needs to pay the price for it.
People will immediately establish the most acute vigilance as a result.
Of course, this matter should be passed on for others to bear; naturally, that would be the best outcome.
However, if everyone wants others to bear such risks on their behalf, then in the end, who will bear them?
Perhaps in the mutual shirking of responsibilities, the conclusion that remains will gradually lead to no longer having the most appropriate way to handle the problem.
It's hard to say whether everyone will thus be able to face the events unfolding in front of them.
They may not necessarily have a way to manage the situation that others would consider the most satisfactory.
Apart from this, there seems to be no other action that is seen as a better way to address the problem.
