Moreover, whether before or after proving, one cannot be in the public gallery.
So those who say witnesses are directly waiting in the public gallery are either talking nonsense or their local court is indeed not strict.
In the Criminal Court, the Judgment Chief announced the start of the trial, and Lao Tang, as the defense attorney, read the application for retrial.
The core argument of the application for retrial is that the actions of the inspection team were illegal!
"According to Article 226 of the Criminal Law, anyone who obstructs the work of state functionaries by violence or threats shall be sentenced to no more than three years in prison, criminal detention, public surveillance, or fined."
"Therefore, we can know that there is a very important prerequisite for the crime of obstructing public service, which is that the state functionaries perform their duties according to law, and only in this case, will it constitute the crime of obstructing public service."
