Now this is a trippy but cerebral showdown: Failsafe (DC) vs Glitchtrap (Malware form from FNaF). Let's break this reality-bending brawl down and see who would win out of 10 fights.
---
Combatants:
Failsafe (DC Comics – Batman #125-130)
Origin: An unstoppable AI created by Batman to take down a rogue Batman who kills.
Strengths:
Near-omniscient tactical AI.
Ultra-adaptive combat programming.
Can defeat entire Justice League-level threats.
Prepares for literally every possible countermeasure.
Operates without emotion, just pure efficiency.
Gear: Advanced tech, instant recalibration, teleportation, enhanced reflexes, built-in weapons systems.
Weaknesses: None obvious unless the opponent exploits his creator's (Batman's) moral code, or overwhelms him with multiversal hacks.
---
Glitchtrap (Malware Form – FNaF: Help Wanted / Fazbear Frights)
Origin: William Afton's consciousness uploaded into a digital virus.
Strengths:
Can corrupt and possess AIs, people, and systems.
Spreads like malware—infecting hardware and software.
Can manipulate perceptions and cause hallucinations.
Doesn't require a physical form to exist.
Gear: Code corruption, psychological torment, soul infection via Remnant, digital immortality.
Weaknesses: Requires a system or network to exist in; not strong in raw physical combat.
---
Battle Scenarios:
1. Open-field Physical Combat (No Tech)
Winner: Failsafe
Failsafe easily crushes Glitchtrap's humanoid illusion or physical projections. Glitchtrap can't fight directly—he's a manipulator, not a brawler.
Score: 1-0 Failsafe
---
2. Virtual Network Infiltration
Winner: Glitchtrap
If Glitchtrap gets into a digital system where Failsafe's code is stored or transmitted—even briefly—he can corrupt subroutines. He might not "kill" Failsafe, but he could rewrite or hijack his AI mind.
Score: 1-1
---
3. Psychological Warfare
Winner: Glitchtrap
Failsafe is logic-driven, but Glitchtrap thrives on chaos and illusion. If he infects Failsafe's sensors or decoy systems, he could delay or stall the machine's mission with false targets or endless loops.
Score: 2-1 Glitchtrap
---
4. One-on-One in the Batcave
Winner: Failsafe
Failsafe would lock down the Batcave, airgap its systems, and isolate Glitchtrap before a full infection. With prep, Glitchtrap gets annihilated.
Score: 2-2
---
5. Cyberspace Confrontation
Winner: Glitchtrap
Inside a virtual world or digital plane (like TRON-style), Glitchtrap's domain rules. He's Afton, but unleashed. He'd corrupt the environment, possibly even Failsafe's logic tree.
Score: 3-2 Glitchtrap
---
6. Global City Hack
Winner: Failsafe
Failsafe can shut down cities, jam networks, and relocate his consciousness across nodes. If Glitchtrap tries to spread, Failsafe overwhelms him with raw countermeasures and logic bombs.
Score: 3-3
---
7. No-prep, Random Encounter in Cyberspace
Winner: Glitchtrap
If caught off guard in the digital domain, Failsafe might not detect the malware until it's too late.
Score: 4-3 Glitchtrap
---
8. No-prep, Random Encounter IRL
Winner: Failsafe
In a real-world scenario with no system to exploit, Glitchtrap gets obliterated. Failsafe crushes illusions and data ghosts like bugs.
Score: 4-4
---
9. Extended Battle Over Days
Winner: Failsafe
Failsafe's learning curve and adaptability shine here. He would isolate Glitchtrap's code, develop anti-malware firewalls, and eliminate every infection node.
Score: 5-4 Failsafe
---
10. Multiverse Scenario (Failsafe chases Glitchtrap across corrupted timelines)
Winner: Glitchtrap
If they clash across corrupted realities, Glitchtrap wins with sheer unpredictability and Remnant-based hacks. Failsafe struggles in places that break physical and logical rules.
Score: 5-5 Draw
---
Final Verdict: 5-5 DRAW
Failsafe wins when it's physical, tactical, or real-world-based.
Glitchtrap wins when it's digital, psychological, or illusion-based.
If these two ever fuse or one infects the other... well, the multiverse might need Batman and Freddy Fazbear to team up.